A new draft Law of the State of Washington characterized as a repeal of the statement of rights of state parents now includes a provision that allows information to be essentially retained from parents regarding their children’s assaults for up to 48 hours .
State Senator Claire Wilson, D-Federal Way, witnessed from the state of the state of Washington, the bill in general “does not change any right” and is a “Cleaning Law” bill that updates the health provisions of health to align with the current law.
At an audience of the Chamber Education Committee this week, a legislator tried unsuccessfully to undo the 48 -hour rule and require an immediate notification of the parents.
“The underlying bill essentially establishes that schools can wait 48 hours before telling parents if their children were involved in some type of criminal action or if there was any inappropriate sexual behavior of the staff,” said state representative Travis Couture, R-Shelton.
The state of Washington proposes protections for unemployed illegal immigrants
“And we have seen an impressive amount of inappropriate sexual behavior and sexual aggressions by educators in our schools just in the last year.”
He cited reports that two directors in the Vancouver area, Washington, “Hid Information” of parents about inappropriate sexual behavior against a teenager.
“As a father, I would be disgusted and sick to know if my children had some kind of sexual abuse about the staff, and they did not immediately notify me of those things … for the love of God, vote and yes (in the amendment).”
But Democrat Lillian Ortiz-Self argued that, as a school counselor, she was trained in how to deal better with such situations.
“It is very clear that we take the direction of the application of the Law and the Department of Services of Children and Families every time there is a crime that has taken place and that we must sit here and give them the time to do the investigation so that you can Serve justice.
Washington’s state democrats accidentally send their full Senate’s fiscal plan to the full -email
Ortiz-Self said that the authorities should not have their “prevented” investigations, to which Ktth Jason Rantz reacted incredulous in a column.
“She didn’t say, most likely because it’s a completely artificial concern,” he wrote.
The Couture amendment to guarantee the notification of the parents immediate vote is not successful.
After the attempt to undo the change, another member of the Committee raised a new amendment regarding the notification of the parents if they are accused of a crime and have “more than a meeting and greets with a police officer.”
“We have just heard if the police are involved, parents must also participate. They should have the minimum of a notification when it comes to the police that questions a child,” said state representative Matt Marshall, R-Roy.
Click here to get the Fox News application
“There are simply certain protections that give us all members of society given by our Constitution. And one of them is the right to legal protection. And we are innocent until it is demonstrated that parents are not even involved, then children Potentially they are not aware of their rights.
Later, Marshall said that the committee’s Democrats rejected two dozen republican amendments in what he called a “shameless contempt for parents’ rights” and children’s safety.
“(This is) one more proof that the Democrats care more about their aroused agenda than protecting our children,” he said.
